The Unintended Consequences of the Green Homes Grant

How government policy created a housing crisis

The Well-Intentioned Policy

In 2020, the UK government launched the Green Homes Grant—a £2 billion scheme offering homeowners up to £5,000 (£10,000 for low-income households) to install energy-efficient improvements. The goal: reduce carbon emissions and help homeowners save on energy bills. The result: thousands of properties made unmortgageable and lost tens of billions in collective value.

What Was the Green Homes Grant?

Program Overview (September 2020 - March 2021)

Funding Structure

  • • Government covered 2/3 of improvement costs (up to £5,000)
  • • Low-income households could receive 100% funding (up to £10,000)
  • • Homeowners paid remaining 1/3 themselves
  • • Work had to be done by government-approved installers

Eligible Improvements

Primary measures:

  • • Insulation (including spray foam)
  • • Heat pumps
  • • Solar thermal systems

Secondary measures:

  • • Double/triple glazing
  • • Heating controls
  • • Draught proofing

The Fatal Flaw:

Spray foam was explicitly included as eligible "insulation" without any warnings about mortgage/insurance consequences. Government-approved installers aggressively marketed it as a free/cheap solution.

How It Went Wrong

Problem 1: Aggressive Marketing by Installers

Government approval gave spray foam installers massive credibility. Marketing messages:

"Government-funded home improvement!"

"The government is covering 2/3 of the cost because spray foam is the most effective insulation available."

"Save £500+ per year on energy bills!"

"Professional installation normally £8,000—you pay just £2,000 with the grant."

"Quick decision needed—grant ending soon!"

"Limited funding available. Book now or miss out on free government money."

What installers DIDN'T disclose: Mortgage lenders would reject these properties within 2-3 years.

Problem 2: No Due Diligence on Long-Term Impacts

Government failed to consult mortgage lending industry before including spray foam in scheme.

What should have been checked:

  • • Do lenders accept spray foam? (Answer: Increasingly no)
  • • Does RICS guidance flag concerns? (Answer: Yes)
  • • Are there building regulation issues? (Answer: Yes, ventilation)
  • • Will insurers cover these properties? (Answer: Increasingly no)

Basic due diligence would have revealed spray foam was inappropriate for grant funding.

Problem 3: Vulnerable Homeowners Targeted

Low-income households eligible for 100% funding (£10,000) were heavily targeted:

  • • Older homeowners on fixed incomes
  • • Families struggling with energy bills
  • • First-time buyers in older properties
  • • People with limited financial sophistication

The pitch: "Free home improvement from the government—no catch, no cost to you!"

These are precisely the homeowners who can least afford £8,000-£15,000 removal costs or property value losses.

Problem 4: Rushed Implementation

Scheme launched September 2020, originally ending March 2021 (6 months). Extended to September 2021 after poor uptake.

Implementation problems:

  • • Installer approval process inadequate (many cowboys approved)
  • • No quality control on installations
  • • No consumer protection warnings
  • • Application portal repeatedly crashed
  • • Homeowners pressured to sign quickly before funding ran out

Speed prioritized over safety—classic policy failure pattern.

The Scale of Damage

Estimated Impact

Properties Affected

Conservative estimate: 15,000-25,000 properties had spray foam installed via Green Homes Grant

Additional impact: Grant legitimized spray foam, encouraging 30,000-50,000 more private installations (2020-2022)

Total affected: 45,000-75,000 UK properties

Financial Impact on Homeowners

Per property value loss: £20,000-£80,000 (30-50% discount for cash buyers)

Removal cost per property: £3,000-£20,000 to restore mortgageability

Average total impact: £15,000-£40,000 per affected homeowner

Collective homeowner losses: £675 million - £3 billion

Government Cost

Grant payments for foam installations: £30-£75 million (2/3 of 15,000-25,000 installations @ £3,000-£6,000 each)

Future liability: Potential compensation claims if policy deemed negligent

Taxpayers funded creation of unmortgageable properties

Real Victim Stories

Case 1: The Johnsons (Low-Income Family)

Background: Family of 4, household income £28,000. Property worth £185,000. Qualified for 100% grant funding (£10,000).

What happened: Installer cold-called January 2021. "Free government-funded insulation to cut your energy bills by £600/year!" Signed up immediately. Foam installed February 2021.

Discovery: Tried to remortgage December 2023 (fixed rate ending). Nationwide rejected due to foam. No other lender would accept.

Current situation: Trapped on lender's standard variable rate (7.5% vs 4.5% available rates). Extra £4,500/year mortgage cost. Cannot afford £8,000 removal. Cannot sell without massive loss.

Case 2: Margaret (Pensioner)

Background: Age 71, widow, living on state pension. Property worth £240,000. Struggling with £180/month heating bills.

What happened: Saw Green Homes Grant TV advert. Applied August 2020, approved for £5,000 grant. Paid £2,500 herself (her entire savings). Foam installed October 2020.

Discovery: Needed equity release 2024 to fund care home for herself. All providers rejected due to foam.

Current situation: £240,000 property equity inaccessible. Cannot afford care home (£3,800/month). Cannot afford removal. Facing forced house sale at 40% discount to cash buyer—losing £90,000+.

Case 3: First-Time Buyer

Background: Sarah, age 28, purchased first home September 2020 (£210,000). Previous owner had installed foam via Green Homes Grant July 2020.

What happened: Lender (Santander) approved mortgage September 2020—before foam became widely flagged issue. Survey missed foam (poor surveyor). Completed purchase.

Discovery: Tried to remortgage September 2024 (5-year fixed ending). All lenders rejected. Trapped.

Current situation: Paid £8,500 for emergency removal (August 2024). Lost life savings. Now has mortgage but effectively bankrupt. Considering whether to pursue seller/surveyor for damages.

Why Government Hasn't Fixed It

1. Scheme Already Ended

Green Homes Grant closed September 2021. Government position: "That program is finished. Current issues are homeowner responsibility."

2. No Legal Liability (Probably)

Government argues:

  • • Homeowners made choice to participate
  • • Installers (not government) responsible for disclosure
  • • Lending/insurance industries changed policies post-grant
  • • No explicit government guarantee properties would remain mortgageable

3. Cost of Compensation

If government admitted fault and funded removal for all affected properties: £135-£500 million minimum. Politically unpalatable.

4. Embarrassment & Blame-Shifting

Admitting policy failure opens government to criticism, lawsuits, and political damage. Easier to stay silent and hope issue fades.

What Should Have Happened

Policy Best Practices (Ignored)

✓ Consult with mortgage lending industry

Before including product in grant scheme, verify it won't affect mortgageability

✓ Require full disclosure from installers

Mandatory written warnings about mortgage/insurance implications

✓ Exclude problematic products

If mortgage industry flags concerns, remove from eligible measures list

✓ Quality control & audits

Verify installations meet standards, homeowners properly informed

✓ Long-term monitoring

Track whether grant-funded improvements cause problems 5-10 years later

Options for Grant Victims

1. Pay for Removal Yourself

Reality: Government not offering compensation. Most victims must fund removal from savings/loans.

Cost: £3,000-£20,000. Restores property value and mortgageability.

2. Pursue Installer for Damages

Possibility: If installer failed to disclose mortgage consequences, may have breached consumer protection law.

Challenges: Many grant installers now dissolved/untraceable. Legal costs high. Success uncertain.

Consult solicitor specializing in consumer law for free initial assessment.

3. Contact Your MP

Political pressure: If enough grant victims contact MPs, government may establish hardship fund or compensation scheme.

Provide: dates, installer details, current situation, financial impact. Request MP raise issue in Parliament.

The Lessons

Policy failure: The Green Homes Grant demonstrates what happens when government rushes policy without consulting affected industries and protecting consumers.

Victim impact: 45,000-75,000 homeowners—many vulnerable—face £15,000-£40,000 losses each, totaling £675 million - £3 billion collectively.

Current reality: Government not offering compensation. Victims must fund removal themselves or accept massive property value losses.

If you had foam installed via Green Homes Grant: removal is your only practical solution. Don't wait for government help that isn't coming.

Fix Your Grant-Funded Problem

Get removal quotes and restore your property value

Request Free Quotes